Stocking Tops Showing

Comments and ratings

• Sem identificação da rapariga, um tanto ou quanto demasiado para não variar.

  
  Adamastor
  Jan 27, 2023 @ 22:33:21

• Endless love....

  
  adnarim8391
  May 16, 2021 @ 18:33:45

• 50.115384, 14.445738

  
  Praguer99
  Jun 30, 2020 @ 21:27:55

• pretty nice girl - good location - mor details and camera angels would be great

  
  condomy
  Jun 05, 2016 @ 6:40:10

• stop voting this up... we don't like this girl enough to bring her back...

  
  bigjdog3412
  May 17, 2016 @ 4:51:02

• G2P had this poll done in the past. Results were almost half and half then. Who knows if things would be much different now.

  
  Tufxu8rHv
  May 17, 2016 @ 0:52:15

• Yes! I agree with what you all said - let's ask the producer to start a new 'Close-Up' poll! It should be detailed enough, not just two mutually exclusive options - 'close-up' OR 'no close-up'. This could be further discussed. Hope he will read these comments.

  
  XTGBPGtpW
  May 17, 2016 @ 0:39:02

• i don't mind close ups for shorts periods of time otherwise you don't get a good view because it's too far away. but not the whole time i guess

  
  bigjdog3412
  May 16, 2016 @ 17:45:01

• If the producer actually reads the comments, he might choose to let members VOTE for the close ups, as well as anything else he likes, that's his website remember. And the reason for this is that several people seem to express they don't like it, but there might be more that do. It will be wrong for him to follow only what those that use (or overuse) the comment feature want. I don't think it's a bad idea to have more frequent polls, so that people can express themselves about clothing, panties or not, chubby or skinny, or anything else.

  
  mpguard
  May 16, 2016 @ 16:01:23

• I'd like to kindly ask the producer if he ACTUALLY READS THE COMMENTS. Specifically, for a long time there has been a lot of negative comments regarding the CLOSE-UP overuse. The point is - videos are ALREADY VERY DETAILED AS IS (up to 1080P) when filmed with proper full body framing, close-ups unnecessary rip apart and destroy the big picture, 'chopping off' everything (especially girls' faces) etc. All are very valid and reasonable concerns. But we still keep having those in every single new video. We need to clarify if THIS IS JUST A BACK-LOG of previously filmed videos OR G2P just disregards the members opinion? Finally, let's do another poll maybe, this time about close-ups? Maybe you consider using picture-in-picture for close-ups? For me personally it's really becoming a major 'make-it or break-it' issue. Based on comments - same for others as well.

  
  XTGBPGtpW
  May 16, 2016 @ 14:05:06

• Yes........I was waiting for that

  
  EqyfGuwZW
  May 16, 2016 @ 7:32:58

• Okay, but it's always the same. A very long walk away and no view of the piss stream and the whole puddle.....

  
  NordbahnhoF
  May 16, 2016 @ 5:07:54

• She does have a rather noticeable B-hole... I say just let her do whatever other porn she does if any...

  
  bigjdog3412
  May 16, 2016 @ 3:09:44

• Not bad and special thanks for keeping those unwanted 'cherries' from falling down this time. Still she and her easily sticking out 'exhaust pipe' look a little weird though... Especially in comparison to the beautiful 'Nervous Blonde' - my current favorite.

  
  XTGBPGtpW
  May 16, 2016 @ 2:05:00

• This is the best she has looked to date. She's really not a bad looking girl and the lighting and setting were great. For the future, probably some earrings and lipstick will make her look from pretty good to great.

  
  Tufxu8rHv
  May 16, 2016 @ 1:44:38

• I have to agree with bigjdog, but I think her pee was too herky-jerky, not a strong continuous stream.

  
  cM9HEKs0p
  May 16, 2016 @ 1:12:07

• decent pee but i just dont find her attractive enough...

  
  bigjdog3412
  May 16, 2016 @ 1:05:01

More peeing updates from this Girl

Librarian Booties Jul 15, 2016 95% 5

Puddle Streams Jun 14, 2016 94% 8

Dotted Stockings Apr 25, 2016 96% 10

The Librarian Apr 1, 2016 88% 17